© 2026 VideoMan | Contact / Contact: info@videoman.gr | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use
Loading the player...
The paradoxical truth for purebred dogs
(44) | 05/08/2014 | The Adam Conover tells us the sad truth for purebred dogs, While he explains how he devised the breeds and why the breeding of Thoroughbred is sometimes abuse for the same animals.
Leave a Reply
29 Comments
Advanced Related Posts
The worst species once again is man. He looks to destroy or shape by destroying what he has found in his 'evolutionary' path just to satisfy his ego. We have arrived here in Greece where all animal lovers play it and have 2-3 animals inside or outside the house without most of them having the slightest idea of what kind of care and training they are needed. The result is strays everywhere,dogs that annoy and epitithontai and uninvolved !!!! Good laws for torturing or killing animals enough to apply to those who torment even because they have in their possession.
to assume that those of you who support the opposite...are dealing in real breeds???
The Adam Conover is a standup comedian who lives in Los Angeles and made a career on the backs of fools who watch with reverence the deliberate provocative emissions across channels and internet, and share the provocative extreme positions on all of the sciences and knowledge. Recently, the miserable typakos he decided to confront the 'pedigree dogs'. So what we learn by watching this anekdiigito, unhealthy, and despicable Nazi inspiration vjnteakj; Firstly there are no purebred dogs. (OK, Megale, something you said now, goodbye.) But now begins the nice: What we all consider 'purebred' dogs (or cats) It is actually that teratogenic kyoforithikan from test tubes in laboratories hellish-something style types Mengele, said neat sadism Schizophrenia (or both). All 'purebred' dogs are conceived from inbreeding and are therefore doomed to short lives, suffering from excruciating illness, to the point that some of these dogs, e.g. bulldogs, if they could talk to someone begging to kill to the release of their misery. Also, All Small dogs are unhappy (the terrible comedian does not explain to us why so we are left wondering), so it would be someone to 'relieve' these. Having said and other such monstrous, reaches the following intelligent: To solve all the problems of 'purebred' dogs that breeders should stop to mate with dogs of the same breed(!). Unfortunately, though, says, breeders do not accept this! Delighted that the 'snapped' to those who have 'pedigree dogs', cast end credits. We said, comedian is a man - and even bad.
Erm... my friend what exactly did you not understand; When you reproduce dogs with deformities for your own pleasure or because you look great, While it can not be teratogenic, but certainly not doing good at the same dogs. The korgki say, It is cute because it has short legs and the race has absolutely no utility. It's like constantly reproduce people with dwarfism because amused to see them. The same applies to the Chihuahua and Small Dogs, since they usually have self-esteem problems.
Read carefully my text. I have nothing to add.
Purebred dogs are not Frankensteined or bred in test tubes. Reproduced comfortable and the courtyard of your house. Do not try to create impressions. Everything you say the video applicable. He opened a book on the laws of heredity
I accept the terms of the 'comic' reflects the majority of modern Greek. That is why Greece is the first country in the world in numbers of stray dogs and cats. Where we disagree;
Your text is a verbal attack on this type and those who believe him, along with a simple reproduction of what he says – that's it -. Interesting idea that he might be lying, because I do not even go through the mind, but you do not say something to convince us. On the other hand he says the video, mainly on the grounds of permanent problems are some breeds, seems perfectly reasonable. Even if they didn't make it, it is certain that people would try to 'make' animals cute so that they can sell them and make a living from it. A dog the size of a mouse has no physical point of existence. Imagine the time of Neanderthals.. see wild people, feral cats, wild mice, wild dogs.. wild chihuahua? no ooo.EDIT: example http://www.videoman.gr/63617 ;)(Hello videoman)
Not understand any of my text. I suggest you reread.
Probably you have not understand your text. I suggest you read the summary I gave in the previous post.
Your text, while well written, It is nothing but a big mush. Nothing was achieved. Could you post nice -avasimi- your mudslinging to post here to support your point which apparently boils down to your hatred of the comedian. I'm not saying that you agree with Adam Conover why, apparently, making comedy hosted data as he liked to have the end result that he liked, but, But I tell you that you did not do anything to prove I was wrong. The mudslinging and rhetorical questions are not arguments.
I make clear that it will not respond to any other comment.
Said spokesman of purebred dogs.
So you are dealing with others while you say you are not responding...with your non-response expressing it in words, you answer. You do this even if you do not accept it. Your text was not clear at all so I could have a dialogue. Just do not worry if you think you have expressed your opinion. Many repetitions in speech get tired and any substance is lost.
I'm not coming back to reply to a comment – I've made it clear that I'm not going to do that. I am writing this note to express my sincere surprise in front of the fact that some do not realize that the 'theme' of this publication is not me or my text (as well written, Smart, full, with humor and insightful opinions though – I admit it). I.e., if some of them dealing with such perseverance with me, They had the chance to know me personally, what exactly did, They will cut veins; Why, should add, I have not only intelligence and education, like enough money, but my appearance I would say that it lacks anything: I am sufficiently masculine, Tall, gymnasmenos, with tawny hair and blue eyes. So mEETING, leave me alone and deal with the substance of the matter. Come thumbs!
The ( thoroughbred ) dog is a working dog has been created for a specific purpose in a particular environment, I disagree with the proviso that generated entertainment as I believe that stigmatize certain breeds . You ought to respect the specificities of a ( thoroughbred) dog or if you prefer an artificial ( thoroughbred) , the breed history, the reason that has been created and operate accordingly. I have to agree on the issue with illegal & inhumane farms, but control is the job of the legislation in each country, not mine or yours . All this reminds me of Athens where I used to see some beautiful young ladies who were attracted to Dopermans or pit-bulls , dogs begging to let them run and those just saved from this persistent pulling .
The Americans always talk to extremes in their word. Simply, the inherently purebred dogs is the healthiest of all, enough not to incest with parents and siblings. Just like humans: not incest related, and not cross-breeding tribes. These are insults. The presenter, though, the program shows them that suit the New World Order.
Explain to me a bit what you mean by 'naturally purebred'? A happy man says. We thought we knew well in advance and it is easy to find someone on the internet, the history of each breed. Refer to several websites..
the husky Mr. malamout the n general, the tribes of the fifth group are naturally Pure. thousands of years. of course there are losers who bastardize them and give the puppies to other fathers....
I just didn't understand what he meant by the term 'naturally pureblood'. Why do similar term the video did not want Mr. parexigiso.Yparchoun thousands of breeds and outside the natural choice some are not so blatant that evolved! Many have their own but mutated c example the pug is the bulldogs, says video f, discomfort with their features, so it n was natural selection! He had seen a documentary that the Westies have such a tail,Short and steady, c w t pulls Hunters when entering burrow beagles. Of course it is self? And I say this with caution because I haven't seen the whole documentary.... :/ It is not bad to be a purebred dog and alas if we reverse racism towards them, but I don't accept that some recent dog lovers sneer simply because an animal doesn't look like what some 'Clubs' have set as a standard. And you know very well that in some breeds the standard changes every whenever.
To answer you very soon. There are no 'naturally pure-blooded' creatures, neither dogs nor people. If you put male and female dog together, they will do what you expect, and will not look breeds. In nature the creatures cross freely and survive those that are able to survive. In the frozen areas exist in nature husky, because the rich coat is necessary due to cold. Although born husky with short hair will not survive. 'Pure breeds' exist only in dirty minds.
What exactly you drink and do not give us?
You have a dog and you give birth six puppies. Both have very high legs and therefore are interested. How do you think it will acquire more; You get more if you let me mate in random dogs; No. You get more if you add it to mate with each other or with their mother. Thus the characteristic of interest, (very tall legs) He is more likely to be inherited by the descendants. Do then. 6 other puppies born. Magically, 4 or 5 of the 6 have the characteristic of interest, because they inherited from their parents. Along with this, of course, they inherited a ton of problems related to incest, but your heartbreak, because your dogs are THE BIGGEST FEET Piazza. So keep the puppies that interest and give away the rest at best or throw the trash in the worst. Repeat the process several times and end up embedded in genomic feature so that now all the puppies have. Congratulations. You have now invented a 'new breed' that can have hemophilia, problematic brain, lizard intelligence, but wins the pageant or the races because it has big feet. THIS is the 'breeds' of dogs. Open any book. The so-called new world order not honor the human species to which you belong and called homo sapiens
File.Opoios not rightly understands the obvious reason there is no further discussion.
Thanks. These people wear glasses neotaxika and mistakenly consider as progress the etairomixia (tribal) despite the,what destroys the healthy development of life on the planet Gaia. They ignore the insidious programming, liberal and equate them with etairomixies likeable stray dogs roads. From sophisticated false endorsements in the world of Ideas emanate the wrong attitudes and actions that bring nightmarish consequences. I think people who turn a blind eye to the spiritual hubris (not mentally) dead and I do not have time for them, belong elsewhere. Consideration that Hubris is indeed ugly but attractive as Circe of the Odyssey. The other side, well, of Ivreos is Sagini for that and it is easily committed. Directed against the Nature, in conscience darkness, as that of the Platonic cave, The Hubris functions as illusionist. It is not so much the tyflamara on physical checks, Ignoring basic health Canon, and aesthetic perversion that dominate neotaxikous populations, so that teratogenesis is ignored and attractive amorphousness is projected as beauty. Here in Australia where I am, I work in hospitals. Teratogenesis is artfully disguised. My heart aches when I see sick children in partnerships suffer and have reduced lives by paying for the sins of their parents who voluntarily go blind.. No scientist dares to tell them the cause of their problem which they think is a coincidence. Though, is the 'coincidence' diabolical. It is urgent to understand that when we impose incest, mixing, and animal clonings we play it Gods and that is Insult, as a result, some known-unknowns impose the same on people. When we plant microchips in animals, some others will plant microchips in us too. Because they too - equally wrongly - believe that they are Gods with the right to control us in many ways, and without guilt they do Ivrin which brings disasters in its passage, but that will eventually come to them like a boomerang. – Thanks again.
'Simply, purebred dogs by nature are the healthiest of all' By nature to a large extent yes. But for the rest my friend, I'm sorry, but it's not like that. I'm a veterinarian, and 99% of what has been said is true. The majority of modern races have been created by overemphasizing some heritable trait through selective breeding. (he saw 'mean dog- average dog”) smarter and more healthy and this is statistically confirmed beyond any amfisvitisis!Of course there are 'natural' purebred breeds - Huskies were mentioned etc.- and these were created either for environmental reasons such as survival in cold climates or because of geographical isolation... see Darwin's theory. But be careful:these is healthy and epitychimena only in the context in which created!There is no more unfortunate life than the 'natural' Hassisto climate of Greece!And the respective ellinikos ichnilatis cannot epizisei in Finland!Nature does not anaparagei animals adynatoyn to gennithoyn with normal variations, that cannot be in the island located, that cannot run and hunt. For example, the Australian wild dog (Ntigko), which now has a completely defined body type was created by the dogs of the European immigrants who escaped it. I imagine that these were not all of the same breed... but their characteristics were homogenized and the dog that we see today emerged through natural selection within 350 years. I imagine that this is proven by the fact that the wolf (maturelady or first xaderfos of dog) which has a huge global distribution presents zero variations for this very reason. Natural selection has evolved a very successful model capable of surviving with minimal 'skin' modifications in many places and climates. In what part of the world could a Bullgog survive that collapses from respiratory failure if you run it, or a Chihuahua of enamisi electrodes that toyrtoyrizei all day;The your opinion non-epimeixias ratswn (and in particular this that akoympoyn and the human genos) due to the imposition of some 'new order' they will remain unoccupied by me...
Dear Sound of Void, Errosso. Thanks for your response. Yes, We agree 99%. In this 1% disagreement I shall say to: The Dingo is a wild Australian dogs and is here (Australia) as the Amporitzinals remember. I.e., thousands of years. Europeans are present only 240 years and brought along several dogs from Europe. And are the last 200 years that began the intermarriage of Diggs by major European stray dogs, as a result their species to tinei to exafanisin. At the same time we have to invade like herds in sheepfolds located some Mongrel breed of wild dogs, that kill the quirky and expensive dogs of stanis in order to maul the livestock breeders. The Australian Governments of most States worry so and looking to find a way of preservation of ntigko (I prefer the hunting of wild animals) and at the same time some way of clearing the mad dogs due to meddling and abandonment. As for the meddling between people that you do not accept to comment on, I mentioned for humanitarian reasons. I want to serve the kanwnes of nature, and that's exactly why I'm not interested in being 'politically correct'. I do not accept the imported ideas proskynimenwn international epikyriarchoys as Repoussi, of Pavlopoulos, and Diamantopoulou. I'm not party to do campaign against human trafficking groups or hyperlink. I'm just a social person with some education, experience, and knowledge that I must not conceal, and not to idiwteyw in order to be pleasing to the masters. Those who know something of benefit and the hide is either evil or malicious individuals (idiots).
You can exigiseis what ennoeis that is apotychimeno in chasky natural climate of Greece; If you mean warm, you are definitely wrong because his inner coat acts as air conditioning in hot and cold conditions... and of course we are not in African conditions... I had a husky and I made sure to be informed before and after I got him.. The it ISE ktiniatros gnwrizeis means that not everything about the ratses of animals.. . In general, I disagree with the inbreeding of dogs for reasons of appearance, but mainly for all these idiots who take advantage of dogs to get rich, supposedly taking care of the preservation of the breed... They are simply scammers...
Nice